" Pandemics through the lens of occupations,"Ĭanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. " The Health-Wealth Trade-off during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Communication Matters,"ġ3943, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Carrieri, Vincenzo & De Paola, Maria & Gioia, Francesca, 2020.Brodeur, Abel & Gray, David & Islam, Anik & Bhuiyan, Suraiya Jabeen, 2020.Abel Brodeur & Suraiya Bhuyian & Anik Islam & David Gray, 2021.Ģ103E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics." A Literature Review of the Economics of COVID-19,"ġ3411, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). & Islam, Anik & Bhuiyan, Suraiya Jabeen, 2020. Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. " A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021.PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. " The health-economy trade-off during the Covid-19 pandemic: Communication matters," Vincenzo Carrieri & Maria De Paola & Francesca Gioia, 2021.& Kuhn, Michael & Prettner, Klaus, 2020.ġ3625, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Bloom, David & Kuhn, Michael & Prettner, Klaus, 2021.Ģ020-17, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy." Modern Infectious Diseases: Macroeconomic Impacts and Policy Responses,"Ģ7757, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Bloom & Michael Kuhn & Klaus Prettner, 2020. closure of contact-intensive sectors or the protection of vulnerable groups) alter the nature of the income-infections trade-off with respect to general lockdowns. Separately, the paper also shows how optimal lockdown policies change when there is uncertainty about the strength of the epidemic and mitigation efficiency, respectively, and how targeted measures (e.g. Collectively, a sequential outbreak is thus less costly than a symmetric one. Ceteris paribus, the social welfare loss declines the later an outbreak occurs, implying that the first countries affected act as shock absorbers, providing countries hit at a later stage with a ‘windfall benefit’. The model further takes into account that the sequential outbreak of the epidemic has conferred preparation time to some countries, which has raised the mitigation efficiency of lockdowns. The optimal lockdown determines a set of ‘outcomes’ in terms of welfare, production, income (which is considered to be related to the post-epidemic economic potential) and untreated infections. Using a stylised static model, this paper proposes a policy rule that determines a country’s optimal lockdown intensity as a function of social preferences, the strength of the epidemic and the characteristics of the economy, namely sectoral structure, health care capacity, fiscal space and lockdown compliance. To the extent that the epidemic generates a conflict between these objectives, societies and their decisionmakers have to arbitrate between them. In the short-run, this new objective of “flattening the epidemic curve” may however be at odds with incumbent ones, such as promoting economic growth. In the anticipation of a widely accessible vaccine or an effective cure for the Coronavirus disease (COVID19), governments have resorted to non-pharmaceutical measures, notably lockdowns, to limit the number of infections, without overwhelming their health systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |